Outsourcing Security Doesn't Mean You're Desperate
![]()
Handing over security to a service provider just might be the best way to stay safe.
![]()
![]()
On the surface, giving the security of your networks, systems, and data over to someone else seems like a desperate move--an acknowledgement that the threats are more than you can handle. The reality is that tapping into a service provider might be the best way to protect your company and comply with the latest government regulations.
One caveat: Do your homework. You must know what's in your networks, systems, and databases and clearly define how the service provider is going to help your company meet its security and compliance needs. You also must be sure the service provider is financially stable before trusting it to manage intrusion detection and prevention, log analysis, firewall, or other security services.

Lack of resources and expertise is most often the reason for subscribing to security services. "In the security world, it's a game of catch-up. I couldn't possibly throw enough resources at it internally," says Ken Emerson, director of strategic planning and CIO at Boiling Springs Savings Bank in
Emerson thoroughly checked Perimeter and found it had passed the Statement on Auditing Standards No. 70, a standard set by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants that requires an in-depth audit of a service provider's control activities. "The other outsource firms I looked at didn't have SAS 70 certification," Emerson says. "I'm not going to have depositors if I can't protect their information."
After Boiling Springs signed with Perimeter, a worm got into a PC at one of its branches. Perimeter notified the bank so it could shut down the infected computer, Emerson says.
Kettering Medical Center Network, a group of 50 health care facilities around

0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home